|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 55ec674: * lisp/multifile.el: New file, extracted from etags.el |
Date: | Fri, 4 Jan 2019 02:06:53 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 |
On 03.01.2019 18:35, Stefan Monnier wrote:
Indeed. My conclusion from this discussion is that multifile.el should not accrue commands like those of project.el: it's a library that can be used by things like tags.el or project.el, with a limited scope.
I agree with that. But still, I'm very tempted to rename project-search to fileloop-find-regexp-in-project and project-query-replace to fileloop-query-replace-regexp-in-project.
Renaming it to a less attractive name is probably a good idea.
Or a more specific one, at least. I'd argue that fileloop is not particularly less "attractive" than multifile.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |