Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 55ec674: * lisp/multifile.el: New file, extracted from etags.el

[Juri Linkov]

> There is no problem in that: the package indeed has a limited scope,
> because it contains a particular UI. That's all.

While looking for a good file name we have also to think about good prefixes
for function names, e.g.

tags-loop-continue - old command bound to M-,

multifile-continue - current name

file-loop-continue - this new name makes the most sense

>> BTW, wanted to ask a related question: in multifile.el I see
>> multifile-continue, but can't find its keybinding.  Is it
>> bound to some key like it was earlier IIRC to ‘M-,’?
>
> I think the idea is that the user sets up a binding themselves. E.g. people
> who don't want to use xref will change 'M-,' back to multifile-continue.

But what to do for users who wants to use both?

Maybe we should support next-error, so ‘M-g M-n’ will call multifile-continue.