[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Sep 2018 22:22:25 +0300 |
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:05:18 -0700
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Sure, but the point is that GCC does not lay out structures identically
> on MS-Windows vs GNU/Linux. If it makes an exception for bitfields it
> may very well make an exception for long long.
Yes, the facts are unequivocal. I just don't understand why the
different behavior.
- Re: GDB and compiler-operations, (continued)
- Re: GDB and compiler-operations, Tom Tromey, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/07