[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure (was: Off Topic)
From: |
Van L |
Subject: |
emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure (was: Off Topic) |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2018 11:27:02 +1000 |
> Alan Third writes:
>
> I have to be
> honest, I’ve no idea why. I just use:
>
> ./configure
>
> and it works fine.
Er, not really for me, I get at the end of tag release emacs-26.1-rc1’s
./configure
configure: WARNING: This configuration installs a 'movemail' program
that does not retrieve POP3 email. By default, Emacs 25 and earlier
installed a 'movemail' program that retrieved POP3 email via only
insecure channels, a practice that is no longer recommended but that
you can continue to support by using './configure --with-pop'.
configure: You might want to install GNU Mailutils
<https://mailutils.org> and use './configure --with-mailutils’.
and that might’ve pushed me to explore configure’s switches, by trial and error.
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, (continued)
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/21
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Van L, 2018/05/21
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/22
- Off Topic (was: Should this package be included into the NS port?), Van L, 2018/05/22
- Re: Off Topic (was: Should this package be included into the NS port?), Alan Third, 2018/05/23
- emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure (was: Off Topic),
Van L <=
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Robert Pluim, 2018/05/24
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Van L, 2018/05/24
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Robert Pluim, 2018/05/24
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Van L, 2018/05/24
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Van L, 2018/05/24
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/22
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/22
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Philipp Stephani, 2018/05/19