Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 12:37:39 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, Nick Helm <address@hidden>,
>       address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> >> And, I guess, how does emacsclient beat this one-frame-must-exist
> >> limitation – does it maintain some kind of fake frame that it hides from
> >> the windowing system?
> > That's exactly why your notion of frame-centric Emacs is inaccurate.
> 
> IIRC, the emacs daemon solves this by using the "initial-frame" which is
> associated to the "stdio terminal" (the special frame and terminal also
> used in batch mode).

Yes, but if you count that as a frame, then the one-frame-must-exist
limitation is meaningless, because that frame always exists, it comes
from the time Emacs was dumped.