[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2018 16:36:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (darwin) |
>>>>> "TT" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
TT> Anyway, the backend has some bugs, and it generates "Emacs C core"-style C
TT> code, not "Emacs dynamic module"-style C code.
Could some of our internal C sources be replaced by Emacs Lisp, which the
Makefile would compile into C as part of the regular build process? This would
allow testing using the Emacs Lisp version, with compilation into C for the
sake of performance. And maybe benchmark would even rule out the need to
compile that file in the end...
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading, (continued)
- Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/11
- An Emacs benchmarking suite (was: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading), Siraphob (Ben) Phipathananunth, 2018/05/11
- Re: An Emacs benchmarking suite (was: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading), Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/11
- Re: An Emacs benchmarking suite, Phillip Lord, 2018/05/14
- Re: An Emacs benchmarking suite, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/14
- Re: An Emacs benchmarking suite, Stefan Monnier, 2018/05/14
- Re: An Emacs benchmarking suite, Phillip Lord, 2018/05/15
Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading, Tom Tromey, 2018/05/10
- Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading, John Wiegley, 2018/05/10
- Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading, Tom Tromey, 2018/05/14
- Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading, Tom Tromey, 2018/05/21
- Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading, John Wiegley, 2018/05/21
- Re: An idea, now that we have dynamic loading, Tom Tromey, 2018/05/22