|
From: | Reuben Thomas |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++ |
Date: | Sat, 14 Oct 2017 17:36:11 +0100 |
Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> writes:
> On 14 October 2017 at 09:00, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> See
> http://www.flycheck.org/en/latest/user/flycheck-versus- flymake.html#flycheck-versus- flymake
That page is now completely outdated. If you have a serious interest in
updating it, I can provide you with information about the new Flymake
that isn't already in its manual. Otherwise, please don't advertise a
misleading comparison.
I believe it is generally naive to think such a thing. But
specifically, I've had a look at flycheck.el and (again, if you are
really interested) I am willing to debate why I think parts of its
implementation are inferior to my rewrite of Flymake.
Finally, being in Emacs also means it gets the care and attention of a
very talented group of programmers that share the common goal of
improving GNU and Emacs as a whole.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |