[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++ |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Oct 2017 10:33:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> writes:
> On 14 October 2017 at 02:34, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> It is important to fix this, since it is not good for Flymake to fail
> on the GNU example of proper packaging.
>
> It could be fixed in Flymake or fixed in GNU Hello.
> Which one is better?
>
> These days, it seems much better to use Flycheck than Flymake (that's
> certainly what I do). See https://github.com/flycheck/flycheck
In the context of this specific subthread, can you tell us if Flycheck
automatically infers the compilation flags of, say, GNU Emacs and GNU
Hello when checking C code? Does it do so for any other project?
João
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/24
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, Richard Stallman, 2017/10/25
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, Reuben Thomas, 2017/10/26
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, Richard Stallman, 2017/10/28
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/10/18
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, John Wiegley, 2017/10/18
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, Stefan Monnier, 2017/10/14
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, Sami Kerola, 2017/10/14
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++,
João Távora <=
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, guillaume papin, 2017/10/14
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, João Távora, 2017/10/14
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, Reuben Thomas, 2017/10/14
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/10/18
- Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, João Távora, 2017/10/18
Re: [PATCH] Flymake support for C/C++, João Távora, 2017/10/14