[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Licence of ts-comint
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Licence of ts-comint |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:12:16 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> In my own company, for example, we can never use GPL libraries,
> because they carry too much legal burden to be worth it.
Is this because the company makes nonfree programs?
We release a library under the GPL when we want to prevent it from
being used in nonfree programs. When we decide it is advantageous to
allow use of a certain library in nonfree programs, we release it
under the Leser GPL or something like the libGCC exception.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, (continued)
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Paul Eggert, 2017/08/13
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Stefan Monnier, 2017/08/13
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/21
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, John Wiegley, 2017/08/21
- Re: Licence of ts-comint,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/22
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, John Yates, 2017/08/22
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Paul Eggert, 2017/08/22
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, John Yates, 2017/08/22
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Paul Eggert, 2017/08/22
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, Richard Stallman, 2017/08/23
- Re: Licence of ts-comint, John Wiegley, 2017/08/22
- [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Stefan Monnier, 2017/08/22
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Radon Rosborough, 2017/08/23
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint, Paul Eggert, 2017/08/23