[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?
From: |
Göktuğ Kayaalp |
Subject: |
Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ? |
Date: |
Sun, 28 May 2017 17:44:48 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Jean-Christophe,
thanks a lot for the detailed response, I'm glad that I wasn't
unintentionally spamming the list. Given your experience and your
confidence about the success of the effort, I'm convinced. I'll follow
the discussion on the topic, and although I doubt I can be helpful with
the technical part, I'll definitely try to take part in translation once
that becomes the next task to do. If anybody is making a directory of
potential translators: I'm native turkish speaker, and have near-native
english, B2-C1 in italian (studying italian philology).
All the best,
gk.
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, (continued)
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?,
Göktuğ Kayaalp <=