[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 May 2017 10:43:44 +0300 |
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 10:16:14 +0900
>
> Yes but from what I've seen in package/el, a lot of translatable texts are
> not displayed with "message". Some
> use "error", some use other mechanisms.
Internally, they all boil down to a small set of C functions, which is
where we should make these changes.
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, (continued)
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Etienne Prud’homme, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Etienne Prud’homme, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Etienne Prud’homme, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2017/05/28