[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification |
Date: |
Tue, 02 May 2017 09:44:24 +0300 |
> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 13:00:29 +0900
>
> I take the question back. It looks like there is no elegant way to *only*
> trim a string passed to split-string:
No need to take the question back: you actually supplied the answer.
Thanks.
> So I guess improving string-trim in subr-x.el is still relevant...
Yes, I think so.
So I think your patch should use string-trim, and a separate patch
should extend that to accept a non-default regexp.
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/01
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/01
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/01
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/01
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/01
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/01
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/02
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/02
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/01
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/01
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/01
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/01
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/02
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Anders Lindgren, 2017/05/03
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/03
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/04
- Re: lisp/term/ns-win.el modification, Anders Lindgren, 2017/05/04