[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall? |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:23:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 10:00:59 -0400 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> With Emacs 25, yes. But there are still warnings when compiling with
>>>> Emacs 23, I believe.
>>> As I said, if you care about the warnings you get under old Emacsen,
>>> I can't help you (I can understand supporting some older Emacsen, but
>>> worrying about the warnings they give baffles me completely).
>> I haven't asked for help :-)
SM> Can't remember who, but someone requested something like
SM> `compat-funcall` in core Emacs. That's what I was responding
SM> to, fundamentally, and my answer is that we do have that but in
SM> a different form: in the form of idioms like (if (fboundp 'foo) (foo
SM> ...)).
It was me just a few days ago, and I think we've clarified things.
Thanks
Ted
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, (continued)
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/09/22
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/23
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Michael Albinus, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Michael Albinus, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Michael Albinus, 2016/09/25
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/25
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/25