[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall? |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Sep 2016 18:42:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:57:32 -0400 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> There's (if (fboundp '<foo>) (<foo> <bar>)) already (which is much
>> Your code snippet misses the `with-no-warnings' umbrella.
SM> No, it doesn't: the byte-compiler understands the the if+fboundp means
SM> that any call to this function in the branch is "safe" and it won't
SM> signal a warning. That's my point.
I didn't know that. Thanks for explaining. I think the Gnus function
`gnus-funcall-no-warning' can be safely removed then? It's only in three
places, so it's an easy fix, but I want to check in case I missed something.
Ted
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, (continued)
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/09/22
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/23
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Michael Albinus, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Michael Albinus, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/24
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Michael Albinus, 2016/09/25
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/25
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/09/25
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/09/25