Re: Fwd: M-x shell question

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Kaushal Modi <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:49:15 +0000
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:29 AM Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>  That name is logical, but inconvenient: you have to type s h e SPC SPC c d.
> 
>  'shell-this-directory' is almost as inconvenient: s h e SPC SPC t.
> 
> I believe that keeping package name as first part of the command improves 
> discoverability. If I were to look
> into what all commands are available related to 'shell', I can easily come 
> across 'shell-cd' or 'shell-foo' with
> packages like ido or counsel or helm and start using it. But if the command 
> is 'cd-shell', that reduces the
> discoverability (unless you have the fuzzy search enabled in packages like 
> ido).
> 
> I would just bind 'shell-cd' to a binding (like "C-c d s" maybe? :) ), if I 
> find myself using it very often.

We could also have an alias for faster typing.