[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
M-x shell question
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
M-x shell question |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:45:15 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I'm thinking that M-x shell should cd the subshell
to the current directory of the buffer you're in
when you type M-x shell. I often want to do that.
Or perhaps C-u M-x shell should do that.
The current behavior of C-u M-x shell, to use a different buffer name
for the shell buffer, is not very useful; if you want to make multiple
shell buffers, the easiest way is to make each one as *shell* and
rename it.
Is anyone against?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- M-x shell question,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: M-x shell question, raman, 2016/08/17
- Re: M-x shell question, Uwe Brauer, 2016/08/17
- Re: M-x shell question, Richard Stallman, 2016/08/18
- Fwd: M-x shell question, Kaushal Modi, 2016/08/18
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Richard Stallman, 2016/08/19
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Kaushal Modi, 2016/08/19
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/08/19
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Robert Weiner, 2016/08/19
- Re: Fwd: M-x shell question, Kaushal Modi, 2016/08/19