[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A few thoughts on seq.el
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: A few thoughts on seq.el |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:56:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Nicolas Petton <address@hidden> writes:
> I take back what I previously said, I think it could make sense, even
> if I generally don't like copy/pasting code.
FWIW, there is also room for improvement in the implementation: If a
list L has, say, 100000 elements,
(cl-subseq l 1 3)
will be very slow because it always calculates the length of the first
argument L. Maybe we can do it better in seq.el.
Michael.