[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A few thoughts on seq.el
From: |
Nicolas Petton |
Subject: |
Re: A few thoughts on seq.el |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:48:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.21 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.95.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) |
Tino Calancha <address@hidden> writes:
> D) If the only dependence on 'cl-lib in seq.el is `cl-subseq',
> Would be possible to include a func `seq-replace'
> (stolen from `cl-replace') and then define `seq-subseq',
> a stolen version of `cl-subseq' as well?
>
> That would remove the 'cl-lib dependence, one of the
> arguments to not load 'seq at Emacs start up, AFAIK.
> Does it have any sense?
I take back what I previously said, I think it could make sense, even if
I generally don't like copy/pasting code.
Cheers,
Nico
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: A few thoughts on seq.el,
Nicolas Petton <=