[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number?
|
From: |
Clément Pit--Claudel |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:17:35 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
On 04/06/2016 11:23 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> What is your purpose in mentioning these points? What constructive
> question do they relate to?
Sorry if this didn't sound constructive. You wrote:
> I think url should do what IceCat does: send a user-agent string that
> is widely encountered on the net, to thwart identification of users.
So I pointed out that IceCat is probably one of the most easily identifiable
browsers out there. In any case, this is probably a discussion for
emacs-tangents :)
Clément.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, John Wiegley, 2016/04/03
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/04
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/04/04
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/05
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/04/05
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/04/05
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/05
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/04/06
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/06
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?,
Clément Pit--Claudel <=
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/07