[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number?
From: |
Clément Pit--Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el? |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:57:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
On 04/04/2016 03:26 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> I think url should do what IceCat does: send a user-agent string that
> is widely encountered on the net, to thwart identification of users.
Does it really do that? Where is it documented?
On my machine, it seems to consistently send "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0".
In any case, I don't think this point is relevant to the package.el part of
this discussion. It's trivial for GNU ELPA and GNU MELPA to track their users:
they can just serve arbitrary code that Emacs will blindly run. Thus, if you
don't trust them enough to send them your version of Emacs, then you probably
shouldn't be talking to them in the first place.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, John Wiegley, 2016/04/03
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/04
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?,
Clément Pit--Claudel <=
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/05
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/04/05
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/04/05
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/05
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/04/06
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/06
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/04/07
- Re: Should the default value of url-user-agent include a version number? What about the specific case of package.el?, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/07