[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -Wall
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: -Wall |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:46:45 +0300 |
> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:16:02 +0000
>
> I'm very much in favor of addressing and eliminating all warnings on as many
> platforms as possible.
>
> That'll be a challenge. When I compile with clang -Weverything, I get ~90,000
> warnings.
I don't even think it's a worthy use of our resources. C compilers
move towards more and more noisy defaults, so the real challenge is to
come up with a set of switches that produce a high enough
signal-to-noise ratio. I'm not saying that the current default is
that sweet spot, but -Wall, let alone -Weverything, is certainly not
it.
- Re: -Wall, (continued)
- Re: -Wall, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/04
- Re: -Wall, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/04
- Re: -Wall, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/05
- Re: -Wall, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/04/05
- Re: -Wall, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/05
- Re: -Wall, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/06
- Re: -Wall, Stefan Monnier, 2016/04/06
- Re: -Wall, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/07
Re: -Wall, John Wiegley, 2016/04/04
- Re: -Wall, Philipp Stephani, 2016/04/05
- Re: -Wall,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: -Wall, John Wiegley, 2016/04/05
Re: -Wall, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/05