[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thinking about changed buffers
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Thinking about changed buffers |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:20:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> For me, the full idiom is "SPC DEL C-x C-s" which I use to force Emacs
> to save the file. I'm not sure exactly where/when I need it (it's too
> ingrained in muscle memory), but I think it's mostly when I edit a LaTeX
> document while it's being compiled, because running "pdflatex" takes
> enough time that I may end up saving a file before the end of the
> previous compilation is done, so the file's timstamps don't faithfully
> record the "freshness" of the output.
Now that you mention it, I remember doing that, too. :-)
Does this perhaps mean that the interactive `C-x C-s' command should
always save the file, even if it's unchanged? We've apparently all
taken to doing pointless modifications because we haven't found an easy
way to make Emacs re-save the file...
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, (continued)
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/28
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/28
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Andreas Schwab, 2016/03/28
- Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/28
Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28
RE: Thinking about changed buffers, Stephan Mueller, 2016/03/28
Re: Thinking about changed buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/03/28