|
From: | Leo Liu |
Subject: | Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 b6d6304: Comment on last change to define-derived-mode |
Date: | Mon, 07 Mar 2016 12:10:59 +0800 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (OS X 10.11.3) |
On 2016-03-06 13:01 -0800, John Wiegley wrote: > Wouldn't it change the way old code might get re-indented? In other > words, was this a no-op addition of metadata, or did it have aesthetic > impact on the way code gets indented? I think it is a misunderstanding that missing a (indent N) in an oversight when it is actually a deliberate design. A lot of the def-ish macros have this pattern. See the doc-string of lisp-indent-function. HTH, Leo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |