|
| From: | Paul Eggert |
| Subject: | Re: Character literals for Unicode (control) characters |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Mar 2016 11:03:52 -0800 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 |
Philipp Stephani wrote:
Initially I used ucs-names, but the decided against it because it lacks most characters.
Can you describe in general terms the difference between what's in ucs-names and what's in the new hash table? Should the two things be unified?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |