[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tags-loop-continue
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: tags-loop-continue |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:59:15 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:26:29 +0300
>
> Here's an idea: we remove xref's integration with next-error-function.
> Probably notify the people who asked for it.
>
> And if someone asks for it back, ask them to go fix bug#20489 first.
I was about to suggest this myself. So yes, let's do that. If we
indeed try harder to leave the *xref* buffer visible, the need for
this integration would be lower.
Thanks.
- Re: tags-loop-continue, (continued)
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/22
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/22
- Re: tags-loop-continue, John Wiegley, 2016/01/22
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/22
- next-error-function integration in xref removed, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/23
- Re: next-error-function integration in xref removed, John Wiegley, 2016/01/26
- Re: tags-loop-continue, John Wiegley, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, John Wiegley, 2016/01/22
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21