[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tags-loop-continue
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: tags-loop-continue |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:02:58 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:58:19 +0300
>
> On 01/21/2016 08:47 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure. I am talking about a new command, which will allow the
> > user to select one of the buffers which have next-error-function set.
> > AFAIU, introducing such a command doesn't require any serious changes
> > anywhere, right?
>
> I don't think it would help enough: you might end up having to call that
> newly introduced command before every `next-error' invocation:
> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20489#11
Yes, I know. But in this case a partial solution is better than no
solution at all, IMO. We don't need to solve every corner case now.
- Re: tags-loop-continue, (continued)
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/14
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/14
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/14
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/18
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/20
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/20
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/21
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/22
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/22
- Re: tags-loop-continue, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/22
- Re: tags-loop-continue, John Wiegley, 2016/01/22