[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function
|
From: |
Helmut Eller |
|
Subject: |
Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:19:24 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, Apr 30 2015, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> Yup, a ring might be a replacement for both next-error-last-buffer and
> next-error-buffer-p. But when will buffers be popped from it?
Maybe never, or more precisely: dead buffers in the ring are ignored and
removed automatically.
I don't know what the issue with flymake is but it would certainly be
nice if this would work without having to update existing clients.
Helmut
- Re: UI inconveniences with M-., Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/28
- Re: UI inconveniences with M-., Helmut Eller, 2015/04/29
- conflicting uses of next-error-function (was: UI inconveniences with M-.), Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Helmut Eller, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Helmut Eller, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function,
Helmut Eller <=
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/30
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Helmut Eller, 2015/04/30
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/29
- Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/30
Re: UI inconveniences with M-., Vitalie Spinu, 2015/04/29