|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function |
Date: | Thu, 30 Apr 2015 02:14:13 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 |
On 04/29/2015 09:15 PM, Helmut Eller wrote:
It might be nifty (but more complicated) to organize those buffers as a stack or ring so that a context can be pushed/popped; if so then it might be useful to use an integer instead of a boolean as value for this buffer local variable.
Yup, a ring might be a replacement for both next-error-last-buffer and next-error-buffer-p. But when will buffers be popped from it?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |