[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches
|
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
|
Subject: |
Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:38:55 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:54:17 +0100 address@hidden (Phillip Lord) wrote:
PL> Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
>> Some people use "scratch/", which seems sensible to me. (But there's
>> also one "fix/" and one "feature/" ...)
PL> "fix" and "feature" are after gitflow, which is how they got there, but
PL> I think "scratch" was the final decision.
PL> The fix/ branch was me; as it's going to take me a long time to finish,
PL> I've removed it.
I've removed one `feature' branch too. Please let us know what other
existing branches don't match the conventions so we can remove or rename
them.
Ted
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, (continued)
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Oleh Krehel, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Achim Gratz, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Oleh Krehel, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Achim Gratz, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Achim Gratz, 2015/04/21
Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/20
Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Phillip Lord, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches,
Ted Zlatanov <=