[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches
|
From: |
Phillip Lord |
|
Subject: |
Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:54:17 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
> Some people use "scratch/", which seems sensible to me. (But there's
> also one "fix/" and one "feature/" ...)
"fix" and "feature" are after gitflow, which is how they got there, but
I think "scratch" was the final decision.
The fix/ branch was me; as it's going to take me a long time to finish,
I've removed it.
Phil
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, (continued)
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/20
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Oleh Krehel, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Stefan Monnier, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Achim Gratz, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Oleh Krehel, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Achim Gratz, 2015/04/21
- Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Achim Gratz, 2015/04/21
Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/04/20
Re: namespace convention for short-lived branches,
Phillip Lord <=