Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt.

[Artur Malabarba]

I like the idea of having a library akin to seq.el, to unite
hash-tables, alists, and perhaps even symbol properties. But that
would have to be done by someone else, more familiar with these
structures.

As a starting point, I could patch `get' to work on hash tables and
alists (thus ditching this patch on `elt'), if that's desirable.


2014-12-14 11:47 GMT-02:00 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
>> That would be really nice. subr-x contains some extra hash-tables
>> functions already and I'm wondering how it should be dealt with without
>> implementing some functions twice if we were implementing a map.el
>> library. Should we keep hash-table functions in subr-x and simply alias
>> them in map.el or remove them from subr-x.el?
>
> That's a very minor issue, I think.  Either way would work fine,
>
>
>         Stefan