Re: Merging nth, aref, and elt.

[Stefan Monnier]

> That would be really nice. subr-x contains some extra hash-tables
> functions already and I'm wondering how it should be dealt with without
> implementing some functions twice if we were implementing a map.el
> library. Should we keep hash-table functions in subr-x and simply alias
> them in map.el or remove them from subr-x.el?

That's a very minor issue, I think.  Either way would work fine,


        Stefan