[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ordering of command completions
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Ordering of command completions |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Dec 2014 22:25:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> We discussed the opposite problem a while ago -- excluding commands that
>> only make sense in a specific mode from turning up when doing command
>> completion.
>
> I think excluding those that don't make sense will take too much work to
> work well.
We already have a volunteer to do the markup if we decide how these
should be marked up. :-)
And it's something that would grow progressively better as more stuff is
marked up. For instance, `M-x gTAB' now shows (and I've quickly
estimated here) 2.42E45 commands. If gnus*.el was marked up,
`M-x gTAB' would then show (another quick estimate) 4 commands.
And marking up Gnus would take ten minutes at most.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- RE: Ordering of command completions, (continued)
- RE: Ordering of command completions, Drew Adams, 2014/12/07
- Re: Ordering of command completions, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/12/07
- RE: Ordering of command completions, Drew Adams, 2014/12/07
- Re: Ordering of command completions, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/12/07
- RE: Ordering of command completions, Drew Adams, 2014/12/07
- Re: Ordering of command completions, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/07
- Re: Ordering of command completions, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/12/07
- Re: Ordering of command completions, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/07
- RE: Ordering of command completions, Drew Adams, 2014/12/07
Re: Ordering of command completions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/07
- Re: Ordering of command completions,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
Re: define "out-of-tree"?, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/08
Re: define "out-of-tree"?, Karl Fogel, 2014/12/09