[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ordering of command completions
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Ordering of command completions |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Dec 2014 19:45:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:
> That's ok, but it is also very handy to have a global statement saying
> "all the definitions on this file are bound to `message-mode' unless
> the contrary is explicitly stated."
So we'd have a new top-level declaration
(declare (commands message-mode))
and then we'd have an override in the commands that are global?
(defun message-mail ()
(declare (command global))
...)
That would be a lot less annotating, but it seems a bit kludgy...
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Ordering of command completions, (continued)
Re: Ordering of command completions, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/12/07
- RE: Ordering of command completions, Drew Adams, 2014/12/07
- Re: Ordering of command completions, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/12/07
- RE: Ordering of command completions, Drew Adams, 2014/12/07
- Re: Ordering of command completions, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/12/07
- RE: Ordering of command completions, Drew Adams, 2014/12/07
- Re: Ordering of command completions, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/12/07
- RE: Ordering of command completions, Drew Adams, 2014/12/07
Re: Ordering of command completions,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
Re: Ordering of command completions, Óscar Fuentes, 2014/12/07
Re: Ordering of command completions, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/07
RE: Ordering of command completions, Drew Adams, 2014/12/07
Re: Ordering of command completions, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/07
Re: define "out-of-tree"?, Stephen Leake, 2014/12/08
Re: define "out-of-tree"?, Karl Fogel, 2014/12/09