[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EWW buffers
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: EWW buffers |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:27:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> It’s also perfectly possible to create that buffer but do /not/
> switch to it until it’s ready.
Actually changing the displayed buffer from a process filter
(i.e. asynchronously) is a bad idea, just like prompting the user.
So yes, the *eww* buffer should be created and displayed right away
(empty at first).
Iceweasel does the same, FWIW, so I don't think it's a problem.
Stefan
- Re: Network security manager, (continued)
- EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Re: EWW buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/19
- bug#19109: eww-setup-buffer: use set-buffer instead of switch-to-buffer, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/19
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/23
- Re: bug#19109: mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Glenn Morris, 2014/11/23
- mailing control@, but requesting that no replies be sent there, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/11/24
- Re: EWW buffers,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: EWW buffers, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/11/20
- Re: EWW buffers, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/19
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/20
- Re: Network security manager, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/20
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/11/21
- Re: Network security manager, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/11/21