Re: EWW buffers

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Ivan Shmakov <address@hidden> writes:

> It’s also perfectly possible to create that buffer but do /not/
> switch to it until it’s ready.  It won’t help in the scenario
> being discussed, but to be honest, EWW already pops its buffers
> way to often to my taste.
>
> Consider, for instance, invoking eww-reload in a handful of
> buffers in a row, – EWW will switch to each of these buffers as
> soon as one’s done, which could very well happen in the middle
> of user interaction with some specific buffer.

I think this is a case of "don't do that, then".

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no