[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:46:02 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> This is the expected behavior, as described in the User Manual (see
> the node "Frame Parameters"). Emacs always worked like that.
I still don't get it. The manual you quote says:
You can control the default appearance and behavior of all frames by
specifying a default list of "frame parameters" in the variable
default-frame-alist . Its value should be a list of entries, each
specifying a parameter name and a value for that parameter. These
entries take effect whenever Emacs creates a new frame, including the
initial frame.
So, it seems to agree with Tjernlund that adding entries to
default-frame-alist should be sufficient to affect the initial frame.
Stefan
- default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Tjernlund, 2014/10/23
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Tjernlund, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, martin rudalics, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Tjernlund, 2014/10/29
Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist,
Stefan Monnier <=