[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:12:39 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:51:08 -0400
>
> > I'm quite sure the OP customized the list from .emacs, not from the
> > command line. See the original message, which clearly shows that.
>
> I still don't understand: if I do
>
> echo '(setq default-frame-alist (quote ((background-color . "blue") (font
> . "fixed"))))' >~/tmp/.emacs; HOME=$HOME/tmp emacs
>
> I get the same result: a blue background and an ugly font, both on the
> initial frame and on subsequent ones I might create with C-x 5 2.
Then whoever made this change in behavior failed to update the
documentation, which still says what I wrote.
- default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Tjernlund, 2014/10/23
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Tjernlund, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, martin rudalics, 2014/10/24
- Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Tjernlund, 2014/10/29
Re: default-frame-alist vs. initial-frame-alist, Stefan Monnier, 2014/10/24