[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:20:45 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> This kind of "argument" will get you no points here, cf Ian Grant.
It's not an argument, it's an explanation of why I'm leaving the
conversation.
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/05
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Mike Gerwitz, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/09
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/11