[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:33:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> One problem with that is that quite often Emacs' choice of a coding
>> system for a buffer is the result of heuristics rather than dependable
>> information. Not making a fuzz might often be simplest.
>
> If you try to save a buffer Emacs will check whether all characters are
> encodable, and complain (and ask) if they aren't.
Sure, but a raw byte is trivially encodable since it is no character.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/10/06
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Andreas Schwab, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2014/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, David Kastrup, 2014/10/08