[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 05:42:02 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:29:09 -0400
>
> Largish packages are better off in a separate "external" branch.
Why? The disadvantage is clear: it's more complicated to work with a
package that is on a branch. What are the advantages?
> > because it no longer fits the other packages in externals in
> > this respect.
>
> You mean like w3? rudel? dismal?
> auctex and ergoemacs-mode are the only two "external" packages which
> have some other upstream.
Then README needs some real rework.
- Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, (continued)
Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/18
Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Mario Lang, 2014/06/18
- Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/18
- Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/18
- Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/18
- Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/18
- Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/18
- Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Richard Stallman, 2014/06/19
- Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/06/19
Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Mario Lang, 2014/06/18
Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/18