Re: [elpa] chess.el: Req. for comment/review: Info manual

[Stefan Monnier]

> Yes, please remove it, and then it should probably be moved back to
> trunk,

No, the externals-vs-subtree choice has no relationship to whether the
package has some upstream version somewhere else.  It's just a technical
detail of how the files are stored.

Largish packages are better off in a separate "external" branch.

> because it no longer fits the other packages in externals in
> this respect.

You mean like w3?  rudel?  dismal?
auctex and ergoemacs-mode are the only two "external" packages which
have some other upstream.


        Stefan