[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Freezing frameset-restore
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Freezing frameset-restore |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:35:37 +0100 |
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:16 PM, martin rudalics <address@hidden> wrote:
> But IIUC you mean here a frame that existed
> in the current session or configuration just before you started to
> restore frames and you were not able to use profitably.
Yes. After restoration, there's a set of frames (old and/or new) which
correspond to what was in the frameset. And another, possibly empty,
set of pre-existing frames that do not correspond to the frameset,
they are remnants of the pre-restoration configuration. In some cases
they are kept (C-x r j R), in some cases they are deleted (C-u C-x r j
R).
> At least use "restored upon" instead.
I'll do that.
> Then CLEANUP is too narrow. Maybe something like POST-RESTORE (which
> clearly isn't a good term either) to emphasize that it does _not only_
> deal with frames that were rejected or ignored.
Well, the term CLEANUP was meant to refer to cleaning up the whole
frame configuration afterwards. But I don't mind at all changing the
argument name, if someone can come up with an alternative less ugly
than POST-RESTORE.
Thanks for your comments, BTW.
J
- Freezing frameset-restore, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/05
- Re: Freezing frameset-restore, martin rudalics, 2014/03/06
- Re: Freezing frameset-restore, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/06
- Re: Freezing frameset-restore, martin rudalics, 2014/03/06
- Re: Freezing frameset-restore,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Freezing frameset-restore, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/06
- Re: Freezing frameset-restore, martin rudalics, 2014/03/07
- Re: Freezing frameset-restore, Juanma Barranquero, 2014/03/07
- Re: Freezing frameset-restore, martin rudalics, 2014/03/07
Re: Freezing frameset-restore, Stefan Monnier, 2014/03/07