[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail] |
|
Date: |
Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:33:37 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Wolfgang Jenkner <address@hidden> writes:
> Like other people I have done some experiments with local repositories
> and there is a thing that bothers me: While, by default, `git push' to
> some other git repo succeeds only if this would not change the history
> of what is already in that repo, there is apparently no such safeguard
> against rewriting history in an upstream bzr repo (and pushing to
> a bound branch instead does not quite work).
This should work properly with git-remote-bzr.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/12/01
- Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/12/04
- Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail], Andreas Schwab, 2013/12/04
- Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail], Stefan Monnier, 2013/12/04
- Re: participation & contribution [was: Latest changes with lisp/uni-*.el and leim/quail], Andreas Schwab, 2013/12/04
- adventures w/ git-bzr, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/12/08