[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: call for more ert tests
From: |
Sebastian Wiesner |
Subject: |
Re: call for more ert tests |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:55:28 +0200 |
2013/6/24 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>:
>> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:33:41 +0200
>> From: Sebastian Wiesner <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>>
>> > IMO, unless we require every new feature to come with a test and a
>> > report that no regressions were found by running the existing tests,
>> > we will never get any better testability than what we have now.
>>
>> Then this is probably a good policy, isn't it?
>
> Which policy?
Well, requiring tests for new features or fixed bugs, and confirmation
that there are no regressions from the existing tests.
- call for more ert tests, Glenn Morris, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Lennart Borgman, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Sebastian Wiesner, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests,
Sebastian Wiesner <=
- Re: call for more ert tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Lennart Borgman, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, John Wiegley, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Leo Liu, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, John Wiegley, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Stefan Monnier, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/06/24
- Re: call for more ert tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/25
- Re: call for more ert tests, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2013/06/25