[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Naming internal functions
From: |
xfq |
Subject: |
Re: Naming internal functions |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:16:31 +0800 |
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> This word was never mentioned in the preceding text, so using it here
> will confuse, especially those readers whose first language is not
> English. Never introduce new terminology in the middle of a complex
> description, where each successive sentence builds upon what the
> preceding ones said. Always use _exactly_ the same words as in the
> preceding sentences.
Agreed, please follow this tip/convention.
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, (continued)
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Bastien, 2013/04/15
- Naming internal functions (was: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?), Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/08
- Re: Naming internal functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/08
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions,
xfq <=
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/04/08
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/04/10
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2013/04/10
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Leo Liu, 2013/04/09
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Barry OReilly, 2013/04/09