[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Naming internal functions
From: |
Christopher Schmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Naming internal functions |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:14:54 +0100 (BST) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Eli,
thanks for your feedback.
> (Not that I think "objects" is good terminology in this context, but
> just to show you the principle.)
What's the right terminology? "name" on its own? E.g.
Use two hyphens if the name is not meant to be used by other
packages.
Christopher
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, (continued)
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2013/04/14
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2013/04/15
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/15
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2013/04/15
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/15
- Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Bastien, 2013/04/15
- Naming internal functions (was: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?), Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/08
- Re: Naming internal functions, Stefan Monnier, 2013/04/08
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions,
Christopher Schmidt <=
- Re: Naming internal functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, Christopher Schmidt, 2013/04/15
- Re: Naming internal functions, xfq, 2013/04/15
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/04/08
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2013/04/10
Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files?, Thorsten Jolitz, 2013/04/10