Re: DVCSes, bug trackers, and GNUness

[Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso]

2012/4/25 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>:
> Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Shouldn't we switch to Savannah and fix it? Isn't that what we're
>> supposed to do about bzr? Why isn't there an executive decision to
>> prefer the GNU package?
>
> bzr and git offer the same feature set.  The practical differences
> between bzr and git are minuscule.

Y'know, it's a false dichotomy between bzr and git... It's not as if
git is the only other option. I think hg is far more usable than git
and does not have the performance disadvantage that bzr presents.

At any rate, I'm sure you will find no shortage of opinions from
people who think git is far more featureful than bzr.

> The practical differences between debbugs and trackers like the Savannah
> one are rather huge.

The same can be said between bzr and another DVCS. Really, the *one*
feature that debbugs has and Savane (the software that Savannah runs)
doesn't is an email interrface.

- Jordi G. H.