[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs revision #107149
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs revision #107149 |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:35:58 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
'evening, Wolfgang.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 02:00:43AM +0100, Wolfgang Jenkner wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12 2012, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > But, do you actually have to suppress these support modes? They're there
> > to fontify text screens faster. Why disable them? Nowadays, with faster
> > HW than ever, it seems pointless even to bother.
> The buffer where the fontification happens is not displayed, instead its
> content is inserted in a buffer with a different major-mode, and in
> between emacs stays never idle for the font-lock support functions to
> kick in.
I'm not sure I've fully understood you here. Certainly in JIT lock mode
(the default under GNU Emacs), and probably under lazy-lock too, "no"
runtime is consumed until the buffer is displayed.
font-lock-fontify-buffer (without a support mode) will take some time,
sometimes quite a lot.
> Wolfgang
Alan Mackenzie (Nürnberg).
- Emacs revision #107149, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/10
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/11
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2012/02/11
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/11
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/12
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/13
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Stefan Monnier, 2012/02/13
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/13
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/13
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2012/02/20
- Re: Emacs revision #107149, Alan Mackenzie, 2012/02/21