Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3

emacs-devel

From:	Deniz Dogan
Subject:	Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3
Date:	Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:40:30 +0200
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1

On 2011-10-26 21:19, Andreas Röhler wrote:

Am 26.10.2011 07:38, schrieb Tim Cross:
> split-window-left-right

split-window-top-bottom


+1

whilst I rather kept the old forms as are, introducing the new as aliases


Why?

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

C-x 2 and C-x 3, Chong Yidong, 2011/10/25
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Evil Boris, 2011/10/25
- Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/26
  - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Tim Cross, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Deniz Dogan, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Deniz Dogan <=
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Andreas Röhler, 2011/10/27
  - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Jambunathan K, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Deniz Dogan, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, David De La Harpe Golden, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Juri Linkov, 2011/10/27
    - RE: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Drew Adams, 2011/10/26
    - Re: C-x 2 and C-x 3, Lennart Borgman, 2011/10/26